Search for: "STATE OF TENNESSEE, ADA Claim Only"
Results 1 - 20
of 58
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Apr 2007, 5:27 pm
Separately in the implausible claims department: a page on the DOJ site, much repeated elsewhere, claims that there have been only 650 ADA suits in five years. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 11:35 am
(July 6, 2011), the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit (which covers Ohio, Michigan, Kentucky and Tennessee) recently clarified what a plaintiff must show in order to prove a claim of associational discrimination under the ADA. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 2:00 am
After investigating the claim, the EEOC filed a lawsuit against Dollar General for violating the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). [read post]
25 Sep 2012, 7:30 am
Regarding the plaintiff’s ADA claims, the district court construed her complaint referencing Title III of the ADA as a request for relief. [read post]
25 Sep 2012, 7:30 am
Regarding the plaintiff’s ADA claims, the district court construed her complaint referencing Title III of the ADA as a request for relief. [read post]
19 Oct 2016, 9:29 am
The reason she lost was because the ADA only requires employers to offer reasonable accommodations in order to remain compliant with the law. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 5:45 am
Accordingly, the court granted summary judgment to the employee on his ADA claim. [read post]
20 Nov 2021, 7:29 am
The question was when the plaintiff’s ADA claim against the City accrued. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 7:40 am
Despite some medical reports stating that restrictions from an employee’s broken arm were temporary and evidence that her condition improved over time, a federal district court in Tennessee found that she presented evidence sufficient to show she was disabled under the ADA, including that there were still restrictions in place at the time of her termination 12 months later. [read post]
8 Apr 2021, 3:56 pm
Covid-19 Pandemic Class Action Lawsuit Statistics - Wage and Hour Class Actions Most Common Covid Case of The Week - Wage and Hour Claims Added to Retaliation Claim - Aguayo v. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 2:00 am
As stated by the Tennessee Supreme Courtin Press v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 12:46 pm
Humboldt asked the court to instruct the jury that Lewis could only prevail on her ADA claim if her disability was the sole reason for her firing. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 8:36 am
This difference means that, if an employee in Tennessee decides to bring an FMLA retaliation lawsuit in a situation similar to Seeger’s and Sharif’s, the employer has even more options for defeating that claim than would an employer facing suit in North Carolina, Virginia, or any of the states within the Fourth Circuit. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 3:08 am
The fear is that, as an employer, you do not want to face a claim of discrimination for refusing to hire someone with a physical disability that is protected under the ADA or its state law companion. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 12:50 pm
And while a federal court in Tennessee also denied TVA’s motion for summary judgment as to two of the exams, it granted summary judgment against the employee’s claim that the LCA violated the ADA. [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 3:06 am
Kroll will get a jury trial on her ADA claim. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 11:31 am
In the cases we have seen, “fraud” wasn’t the reason for the underlying misrepresentation on the ADA Claims form. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 11:31 am
David Hancock, general counsel for Maverik stated that the company denies its violations of law and has only agreed to the settlement in order to avoid more expenses. [read post]
2 May 2008, 2:28 am
Today's Jackson (Tennessee) Sun is reporting that Kilgore Flares Co., a Tennessee defense weaponry manufacturer, has been hit with a class action lawsuit related to its neurological testing of hirees: The class action lawsuit, filed on behalf of Robinette Anderson, states that the company uses a nerve test to determine who it hires. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 7:11 am
Denying JCI’s motion for summary judgment on the disability discrimination claims under the ADA and state law, the court first addressed whether a three-part test from Frengler v GM, a 2012 unpublished Sixth Circuit case, or a five-part test under Whitfield v Tennessee, a 2011 published decision, applied for purposes of a prima facie case. [read post]
